DIGG DO NEWS

Three poles of the world

The devastating defeat of the Republicans reflects the crisis of the unipolar model of world order. Too much of a burden shouldered over America. Before she shared it with the Soviet Union, which is quite easier for the existence of States.

Indeed, hostility Sovietisms and Americanism in many ways was in the nature of sports competition. Too much alike were both civilizations. One of the classics of European traditionalism Julius Evola stated: “The USSR and the USA – it ticks on both sides, shrinking in the iron grip around Europe. Different in form but identical in essence they are inspired by one force, alien and hostile. Standardization, conformity, democratic egalitarianism, mania production, violent brains trust, materialism, and finally clearing the way Americanism, only the final phase – the communist ideal of mass-man.

It is curious that in 1930 the Soviet Union there was a kind of cult of America. No one else, but by Stalin himself admiration of American business acumen. “We, – assured the Soviet leader – we respect American efficiency in everything: in industry, technology, literature, life … Among the Americans a lot of healthy people spiritually and physically, healthy in their entire approach to work, to the case.

Or else: “American efficiency – is that indomitable force which erodes their business perseverance all obstacles, which cannot carry through once started it, if even a small thing, and without which serious constructive work.”

The notorious “Soviet threat” is not so much threatened as it helped the Americans. She copied everything. Even the Vietnam disaster was still some justification, because the States to “contain” communism is horrible. Besides, the real confrontation with the Soviet Union forced the Americans to track all kinds of challenges and dignity to answer them.

Thus, the U.S. paid great attention to its southern belly – Latin America. Left here were very strong, and Moscow was trying to take advantage of this. But nowhere, except Cuba and Nicaragua, levoradikalam never managed to establish itself.

Although the possibilities were – just take the example of Chile, where some time typically left national unity. Nevertheless, America is the most that neither is the strongest, “cleaned out” all sorts of left-wing alternatives. However, she pointed out the peoples of Latin America’s “hand of Moscow” and “Soviet threat”. And this act – they were afraid of communism and the Soviet experience of building socialism did not have the humanistic illusions.

And what happened after the fall of the Soviet Union? The Latin American left quickly cleaned up its image and on a wave of national populism took over one country after another. Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, and now again – Nicaragua. And all this – without the Communist excesses, which were, in large part due, dogmatism and categorical revolutionary Marxism. Communist threat to the new left is, of course, do not carry, but geopolitically may constitute a very real threat. Very soon the U.S. will be the strongest in the south of the empire, tuned to them very hostile. And this despite the fact that in America, 35 million Hispanics live in “Latino”, which are ideal for the role of a “fifth column”.

The most important problem of America is not even the fact that it is bogged down in Iraq, but that she managed to threaten the continental prohlopat Bolivarian revolution. She almost lost sight of the southern direction, focusing its attention on the east. And, it seems that this is a national complex. Originating as a transatlantic colony of Great Britain, the States have some morbid desire to fly over the ocean, but as imperial metropolis.

How America can get out of the crisis? Maybe she should return to the previous model of the bipolar world? But this is unlikely to yield. The bipolar model, with its geopolitical dualism is programmed to eliminate one of the poles. A multipolar world, the arrival of which many expect today with the hope of facing the chaos and quite a “hot war”, which teaches good example of the first and second world wars.

Thus, it may be better to choose a middle ground, focusing on the model tree poles world? Trinity overcomes the antagonism between the two opposites, as it removes it, translates into less conflictual format. Before us is even equilibrium system means maintaining a balance of forces. If one element of the system set his face to destroy the other, it will not allow a third element.

Troika leaders could have this configuration.

America, pushed the continental isolating and controlling the New World.

Russia also chose the path of isolationism wide – within the space of the former USSR (medullary Hartlend).

Two participants race superpower XX century would not have been more than “relax”, focusing on some limited, albeit a large space.

But Europe, the alleged leader of the third, is able to speak and as expansionist force destined to establish control over the notorious Rimland – a huge coastal area, encircles Eurasia. Of course, it needs to go to the very strong integration with Islamic countries – especially Turkey. By the way, some of the geopolitics of Europe as a non-conformist times and tend to a similar model. Thus, Martin Schwartz writes about the prospects of “replacing the old axis of Washington-Ankara-Tel Aviv, which has long been hampered Eurasian integration, the axis Paris-Berlin-Ankara-Tehran.

As such, Europe would fulfill the mission of the geopolitical forces restraining the expansion of China. The last face in the future, become a serious contender for the role of a single pole. And what will be its hegemony – it is very difficult and frightening issue. All cursed America, but it dictates not so terrible as he is painted. It can be quite successfully confront and relatively small countries (Belarus, Venezuela, etc.). But the Chinese hegemony can be extremely sophisticated, extremely limiting in all possible opposition. The fact that this civilization is very well able to absorb even more dangerous than suppression. Recall that the Chinese were able to digest the great Western and cosmopolitan Marxism, made him a formidable weapon of national self-assertion (which was never able to make Russia).

So, the U.S. has only one solution – isolationism. If they abandon it, they will be swept away by a wave of the Bolivarian Revolution, which, in contrast to “international terrorism” (this frightening intelligence), is a very real threat.

However, the Democrats will never lead America towards the saving of isolationism. This will only make the Republicans. Indeed, at first Bush positioned himself precisely as a moderate isolationist. He promised to Americans as possible to concentrate on solving the internal problems the U.S. and the strengthening of ties within the New World. Indeed, until September 11, 2001, the Bush administration has sought to limit the American presence in different regions. The U.S. refused to take part in the conflict in Macedonia, as Rumsfeld suggested that NATO reduce its Balkan contingent by one third. Was also reduced by the number of American troops in Bosnia.

Bush has reduced the U.S. role in brokering Middle East and Northern Ireland. Colin Powell ruled out a third of the State Department list of special agents who worked on Clinton’s task in troubled spots around the globe. Their first foreign trip Bush made it to Mexico for a meeting with the local president. He demonstrated a willingness to limit the scope of U.S. influence, only one American continent.

But a thunderous 11 September 2001, and the U.S. were involved in a completely useless to her international adventures. It is possible that this “attack” was a creation of transnational institutions that want to turn America from the path of isolationism. But be that as it may, as a fateful turning point came. Now we must turn back. Bush and his team can go down in history in only two line – or the grave-diggers of America, or its national heroes.

-
About the Author:
Maria Lopez
Article Source